c4ai-command-r-plus-08-2024: benchmark scores, price and ranking

c4ai-command-r-plus-08-2024 from Cohere,Cohere Labs (formerly Cohere for AI) ranks #728 of 743 LLMs on the LLMs Tiger aggregate benchmark score (41.2), based on 4 benchmark results captured up to 2026-10-13.

Organisation
Cohere,Cohere Labs (formerly Cohere for AI)
Type
Open-weight / local model
Open weights
Yes
Released
2024-08-30 (source: epoch)
Aggregate rank
#728 of 743 (score 41.2)

Relative to other models, c4ai-command-r-plus-08-2024 is strongest on DTBench (#114 of 146) and weakest on SimpleBench (#60 of 61).

Across the 4 benchmarks where at least ten models are scored, c4ai-command-r-plus-08-2024 is in the top 10% on 0 and in the top half on 0.

c4ai-command-r-plus-08-2024 benchmark results

c4ai-command-r-plus-08-2024 benchmark scores, ranked against all models measured on each benchmark
BenchmarkScoreRankSourceCaptured
DTBench54.9%#114 of 146Epoch AI Benchmarking Hub2026-10-13
GPQA Diamond34.3%#236 of 275HuggingFace GPQA Diamond leaderboard2026-10-13
LMCA5.0%#106 of 108Epoch AI Benchmarking Hub2026-10-13
SimpleBench17.4%#60 of 61Epoch AI Benchmarking Hub2026-10-13

About c4ai-command-r-plus-08-2024

c4ai-command-r-plus-08-2024 is an open-weight model that can run on your own hardware from Cohere,Cohere Labs (formerly Cohere for AI). It was released on 2024-08-30, according to Epoch AI. No API price is listed for it yet. We hold 4 benchmark results for it across 3 areas, and none is in the top tenth of its board.

Where c4ai-command-r-plus-08-2024 stands

On our aggregate score, c4ai-command-r-plus-08-2024 is #728 of 743 ranked models, in the lower half. Its score is 41.2; the scale is centred on 50, so it sits 8.8 points below the typical model. That beats 2% of the ranked field. Among the 3 ranked Cohere,Cohere Labs (formerly Cohere for AI) models it is #3. The next one up is Command R+ at 45.4.

c4ai-command-r-plus-08-2024, benchmark by benchmark

c4ai-command-r-plus-08-2024 lands below the middle on DTBench: 54.9%, #114 of 146, with 77% of the field scoring higher. Claude Opus 5.5 (max) leads at 98.9%; the closest result above is Mixtral-8x22B-Instruct-v0.1 at 55.1%. It covers dynamic tool-use benchmark. The board median is 68.8%, so c4ai-command-r-plus-08-2024 is 13.9 points below it. Source: Epoch AI Benchmarking Hub, captured 2026-10-13.

GPQA Diamond is a weak spot. c4ai-command-r-plus-08-2024 scores 34.3%, #236 of 275, behind 85% of the models measured. The leader, GPT-6 Astra (max), reaches 95.8%. It covers expert-level science questions. The board median is 71.7%, so c4ai-command-r-plus-08-2024 is 37.4 points below it. Source: HuggingFace GPQA Diamond leaderboard, captured 2026-10-13.

LMCA is a weak spot. c4ai-command-r-plus-08-2024 scores 5.0%, #106 of 108, behind 97% of the models measured. The leader, Claude Opus 5.5 (max), reaches 68.2%. It covers language-model capability assessment. The board median is 29.2%, so c4ai-command-r-plus-08-2024 is 24.2 points below it. Source: Epoch AI Benchmarking Hub, captured 2026-10-13.

SimpleBench is a weak spot. c4ai-command-r-plus-08-2024 scores 17.4%, #60 of 61, behind 97% of the models measured. The leader, Claude Fable 5 (max), reaches 81.9%. It covers trick questions that test common sense. The board median is 41.4%, so c4ai-command-r-plus-08-2024 is 24.0 points below it. Source: Epoch AI Benchmarking Hub, captured 2026-10-13.

Strengths and weaknesses

Reasoning, maths and science: weak, ahead of 8% of the field on average across 2 benchmarks. Its best board here is GPQA Diamond (#236 of 275) and its weakest is SimpleBench (#60 of 61).

Release history

The next one was Command R+ on 2024-08-30, at 45.4.

Reading these numbers

The 4 scores on this page come from 2 sources: Epoch AI Benchmarking Hub (3), HuggingFace GPQA Diamond leaderboard (1). No official leaderboard supplied any of them, so treat them as third-party measurements. With 4 results the aggregate rank can move a lot when one new score arrives.

Models ranked nearby

More from Cohere,Cohere Labs (formerly Cohere for AI)

Compare it on the live leaderboard → · How the aggregate score works