claude-2.0: benchmark scores, price and ranking
claude-2.0 from Anthropic ranks #710 of 743 LLMs on the LLMs Tiger aggregate benchmark score (42.2), based on 3 benchmark results captured up to 2026-10-13.
- Organisation
- Anthropic
- Type
- Frontier model
- Open weights
- No
- Released
- 2023-07-11 (source: epoch)
- Aggregate rank
- #710 of 743 (score 42.2)
Relative to other models, claude-2.0 is strongest on DTBench (#124 of 146) and weakest on OTIS Mock AIME (#168 of 189).
Across the 3 benchmarks where at least ten models are scored, claude-2.0 is in the top 10% on 0 and in the top half on 0.
claude-2.0 benchmark results
| Benchmark | Score | Rank | Source | Captured |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DTBench | 51.9% | #124 of 146 | Epoch AI Benchmarking Hub | 2026-10-13 |
| GPQA Diamond | 34.7% | #235 of 275 | Epoch AI Benchmarking Hub | 2026-10-13 |
| OTIS Mock AIME | 2.5% | #168 of 189 | Epoch AI Benchmarking Hub | 2026-10-13 |
About claude-2.0
claude-2.0 is a frontier model from Anthropic. It was released on 2023-07-11, according to Epoch AI. No API price is listed for it yet. We hold 3 benchmark results for it across 2 areas, and none is in the top tenth of its board.
Where claude-2.0 stands
On our aggregate score, claude-2.0 is #710 of 743 ranked models, in the lower half. Its score is 42.2; the scale is centred on 50, so it sits 7.8 points below the typical model. That beats 4% of the ranked field. Among the 70 ranked Anthropic models it is #66. The next one up is claude-3-opus-20240229 at 43.2. The next one down is claude-3-sonnet-20240229 at 41.9.
claude-2.0, benchmark by benchmark
DTBench is a weak spot. claude-2.0 scores 51.9%, #124 of 146, behind 84% of the models measured. The leader, Claude Opus 5.5 (max), reaches 98.9%. It covers dynamic tool-use benchmark. The board median is 68.8%, so claude-2.0 is 16.9 points below it. Source: Epoch AI Benchmarking Hub, captured 2026-10-13.
GPQA Diamond is a weak spot. claude-2.0 scores 34.7%, #235 of 275, behind 85% of the models measured. The leader, GPT-6 Astra (max), reaches 95.8%. It covers expert-level science questions. The board median is 71.7%, so claude-2.0 is 37.1 points below it. Source: Epoch AI Benchmarking Hub, captured 2026-10-13.
OTIS Mock AIME is a weak spot. claude-2.0 scores 2.5%, #168 of 189, behind 88% of the models measured. The leader, Claude Fable 5.1 (max), reaches 100.0%. It covers competition maths (AIME 2024-25 style). The board median is 57.8%, so claude-2.0 is 55.3 points below it. Source: Epoch AI Benchmarking Hub, captured 2026-10-13.
Strengths and weaknesses
Reasoning, maths and science: weak, ahead of 13% of the field on average across 2 benchmarks. Its best board here is GPQA Diamond (#235 of 275) and its weakest is OTIS Mock AIME (#168 of 189).
Release history
The Anthropic model released before it was Claude 2 on 2023-07-11, which scores 43.7. The next one was claude-instant-1.2 on 2023-08-09, at 45.8.
Reading these numbers
The 3 scores on this page come from 1 source: Epoch AI Benchmarking Hub (3). No official leaderboard supplied any of them, so treat them as third-party measurements. With 3 results the aggregate rank can move a lot when one new score arrives.
Models ranked nearby
- #707 gemma-3-1b-it (42.4)
- #708 GPT-4o (Nov 2024) (42.3)
- #709 GPT-4o (Aug 2024) (42.2)
- #711 qwen2.5-72b-instruct (42.2)
- #712 granite-3.1-1b-a400m-base (42.1)
- #713 Llama 3.2 1B (42.0)
More from Anthropic
- Claude Opus 5.5 (max) (#1, 64.3)
- Claude Fable 5.1 (max) (#3, 61.9)
- Claude Sonnet 5.5 (max) (#4, 60.8)
- Claude Opus 5 (max) (#8, 60.0)
- Claude Fable 5 (max) (#9, 59.9)
- claude-opus-4-8-xhigh-effort (#14, 56.6)
Compare it on the live leaderboard → · How the aggregate score works