Claude 3.7: benchmark scores, price and ranking
Claude 3.7 from Anthropic ranks #434 of 743 LLMs on the LLMs Tiger aggregate benchmark score (47.4), based on 1 benchmark results captured up to 2026-10-13.
- Organisation
- Anthropic
- Type
- Frontier model
- Open weights
- No
- Aggregate rank
- #434 of 743 (score 47.4)
Across the 1 benchmark where at least ten models are scored, Claude 3.7 is in the top 10% on 0 and in the top half on 0.
Claude 3.7 benchmark results
| Benchmark | Score | Rank | Source | Captured |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ARC-AGI-2 | 0.0% | #78 of 87 | ARC Prize official leaderboard | 2026-10-13 |
About Claude 3.7
Claude 3.7 is a frontier model from Anthropic. No API price is listed for it yet. We hold 1 benchmark result for it across 1 area, and none is in the top tenth of its board.
Where Claude 3.7 stands
On our aggregate score, Claude 3.7 is #434 of 743 ranked models, around the middle of the table. Its score is 47.4; the scale is centred on 50, so it sits 2.6 points below the typical model. That beats 42% of the ranked field. Among the 70 ranked Anthropic models it is #54. The next one up is Claude Haiku 4.5 (Thinking 32K) at 47.7. The next one down is claude-haiku-4-5-20251001_32K at 47.3.
Claude 3.7, benchmark by benchmark
ARC-AGI-2 is a weak spot. Claude 3.7 scores 0.0%, #78 of 87, behind 89% of the models measured. The leader, GPT-6 Astra (max), reaches 95.0%. It covers abstract reasoning, ARC Prize public eval set. The board median is 22.8%, so Claude 3.7 is 22.8 points below it. Source: ARC Prize official leaderboard, captured 2026-10-13.
Reading these numbers
The 1 score on this page comes from 1 source: ARC Prize official leaderboard (1). 1 of them come from an official leaderboard and 0 from datasets or third-party runs. The leaderboard also lists 3 other reasoning-effort settings of this model, which redirect here. This page shows the highest. With 1 results the aggregate rank can move a lot when one new score arrives.
Claude 3.7 is also listed at 3 other reasoning-effort settings; this page shows the highest-effort row, which is the one the leaderboard keeps by default.
Models ranked nearby
- #431 gemini-2.0-flash-exp (47.5)
- #432 Gemma 4 26B A4B (47.5)
- #433 GPT-5.1 (Thinking, None) (47.5)
- #435 Llama 4 Scout (47.4)
- #436 Magistral Medium (47.4)
- #437 Magistral Small (47.4)
More from Anthropic
- Claude Opus 5.5 (max) (#1, 64.3)
- Claude Fable 5.1 (max) (#3, 61.9)
- Claude Sonnet 5.5 (max) (#4, 60.8)
- Claude Opus 5 (max) (#8, 60.0)
- Claude Fable 5 (max) (#9, 59.9)
- claude-opus-4-8-xhigh-effort (#14, 56.6)
Compare it on the live leaderboard → · How the aggregate score works