claude-opus-4-1-20250805_32K: benchmark scores, price and ranking
claude-opus-4-1-20250805_32K from Anthropic ranks #542 of 743 LLMs on the LLMs Tiger aggregate benchmark score (46.0), based on 2 benchmark results captured up to 2026-10-14.
- Organisation
- Anthropic
- Type
- Frontier model
- Open weights
- No
- Released
- 2025-08-05 (source: name)
- Aggregate rank
- #542 of 743 (score 46.0)
Across the 2 benchmarks where at least ten models are scored, claude-opus-4-1-20250805_32K is in the top 10% on 0 and in the top half on 0.
claude-opus-4-1-20250805_32K benchmark results
| Benchmark | Score | Rank | Source | Captured |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath T1-3 | 12.6% | #61 of 68 | Epoch AI Benchmarking Hub | 2026-10-14 |
| FrontierMath T4 | 2.4% | #46 of 50 | Epoch AI Benchmarking Hub | 2026-10-14 |
About claude-opus-4-1-20250805_32K
claude-opus-4-1-20250805_32K is a frontier model from Anthropic. It was released on 2025-08-05, according to the model's own name. No API price is listed for it yet. We hold 2 benchmark results for it across 1 area, and none is in the top tenth of its board.
Where claude-opus-4-1-20250805_32K stands
On our aggregate score, claude-opus-4-1-20250805_32K is #542 of 743 ranked models, in the lower half. Its score is 46.0; the scale is centred on 50, so it sits 4.0 points below the typical model. That beats 27% of the ranked field. Among the 70 ranked Anthropic models it is #58. The next one up is Claude Sonnet 4 (unknown thinking) at 46.1. The next one down is claude-instant-1.2 at 45.8.
claude-opus-4-1-20250805_32K, benchmark by benchmark
FrontierMath T1-3 is a weak spot. claude-opus-4-1-20250805_32K scores 12.6%, #61 of 68, behind 88% of the models measured. The leader, GPT-6 Astra (max), reaches 93.7%. It covers research-level maths, tiers 1-3. The board median is 55.6%, so claude-opus-4-1-20250805_32K is 43.0 points below it. Source: Epoch AI Benchmarking Hub, captured 2026-10-14.
FrontierMath T4 is a weak spot. claude-opus-4-1-20250805_32K scores 2.4%, #46 of 50, behind 90% of the models measured. The leader, GPT-6.1 Sol (max), reaches 100.0%. It covers research-level maths, tier 4. The board median is 30.5%, so claude-opus-4-1-20250805_32K is 28.0 points below it. Source: Epoch AI Benchmarking Hub, captured 2026-10-14.
Strengths and weaknesses
Reasoning, maths and science: weak, ahead of 9% of the field on average across 2 benchmarks. Its best board here is FrontierMath T1-3 (#61 of 68) and its weakest is FrontierMath T4 (#46 of 50).
Release history
The Anthropic model released before it was claude-opus-4-1-20250805_27K on 2025-08-05, which scores 50.7. The next one was Claude Opus 4.1 (unknown thinking) on 2025-08-05, at 49.1.
Reading these numbers
The 2 scores on this page come from 1 source: Epoch AI Benchmarking Hub (2). No official leaderboard supplied any of them, so treat them as third-party measurements. With 2 results the aggregate rank can move a lot when one new score arrives.
Models ranked nearby
- #539 Mathstral-7B-v0.1 (46.1)
- #540 Claude Sonnet 4 (unknown thinking) (46.1)
- #541 MiMo-7B-Base (46.0)
- #543 open-mixtral-8x22b (46.0)
- #544 Eurus-2-7B-PRIME (46.0)
- #545 DeepSeek-Coder-V2-Lite-Instruct (46.0)
More from Anthropic
- Claude Opus 5.5 (max) (#1, 64.2)
- Claude Fable 5.1 (max) (#4, 61.8)
- Claude Sonnet 5.5 (max) (#5, 60.9)
- Claude Opus 5 (max) (#7, 60.0)
- Claude Fable 5 (max) (#10, 59.8)
- claude-opus-4-8-xhigh-effort (#14, 56.6)
Compare it on the live leaderboard → · How the aggregate score works