claude-opus-4-6-search: benchmark scores, price and ranking
claude-opus-4-6-search from Anthropic is a recent or sparsely tested model with 1 benchmark result on record; it has not been measured on enough benchmarks shared with other models to receive an aggregate rank. This page lists every score we have, based on 1 benchmark results captured up to 2026-10-13.
- Organisation
- Anthropic
- Type
- Frontier model
- Open weights
- No
- Aggregate rank
- Not ranked yet (too few shared benchmarks)
Across the 1 benchmark where at least ten models are scored, claude-opus-4-6-search is in the top 10% on 1 and in the top half on 1.
claude-opus-4-6-search benchmark results
| Benchmark | Score | Rank | Source | Captured |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LMArena Search Elo | 1,253 | #1 of 28 | LMArena | 2026-10-13 |
About claude-opus-4-6-search
claude-opus-4-6-search is a frontier model from Anthropic. No API price is listed for it yet. We hold 1 benchmark result for it across 1 area, and 1 is in the top tenth of its board.
Where claude-opus-4-6-search stands
claude-opus-4-6-search has 1 result so far and shares too few benchmarks with other models to get an aggregate rank. The rank will appear on its own once more scores are published.
claude-opus-4-6-search, benchmark by benchmark
LMArena Search Elo is where claude-opus-4-6-search does best: 1,253, first of 28. The next result is gpt-5.5-search at 1,242, 11 points behind. It covers crowd-voted web-search answers. The board median is 1,176, so claude-opus-4-6-search is 77 points above it. Source: LMArena, captured 2026-10-13.
Reading these numbers
The 1 score on this page comes from 1 source: LMArena (1). No official leaderboard supplied any of them, so treat them as third-party measurements. With 1 results the aggregate rank can move a lot when one new score arrives.
More from Anthropic
- Claude Opus 5.5 (max) (#1, 64.3)
- Claude Fable 5.1 (max) (#3, 61.9)
- Claude Sonnet 5.5 (max) (#4, 60.8)
- Claude Opus 5 (max) (#8, 60.0)
- Claude Fable 5 (max) (#9, 59.9)
- claude-opus-4-8-xhigh-effort (#14, 56.6)
Compare it on the live leaderboard → · How the aggregate score works