Darwin-397B-ZTC: benchmark scores, price and ranking

Darwin-397B-ZTC from FINAL-Bench ranks #73 of 743 LLMs on the LLMs Tiger aggregate benchmark score (52.2), based on 1 benchmark results captured up to 2026-10-13.

Organisation
FINAL-Bench
Type
Open-weight / local model
Open weights
Yes
Aggregate rank
#73 of 743 (score 52.2)

Across the 1 benchmark where at least ten models are scored, Darwin-397B-ZTC is in the top 10% on 1 and in the top half on 1.

Darwin-397B-ZTC benchmark results

Darwin-397B-ZTC benchmark scores, ranked against all models measured on each benchmark
BenchmarkScoreRankSourceCaptured
GPQA Diamond93.4%#10 of 275HuggingFace GPQA Diamond leaderboard2026-10-13

About Darwin-397B-ZTC

Darwin-397B-ZTC is an open-weight model that can run on your own hardware from FINAL-Bench. No API price is listed for it yet. We hold 1 benchmark result for it across 1 area, and 1 is in the top tenth of its board.

Where Darwin-397B-ZTC stands

On our aggregate score, Darwin-397B-ZTC is #73 of 743 ranked models, in the top quarter. Its score is 52.2; the scale is centred on 50, so it sits 2.2 points above the typical model. That beats 90% of the ranked field. Among the 8 ranked FINAL-Bench models it is #2. The next one up is Darwin-180B-RSI at 52.3. The next one down is Darwin-398B-JGOS at 52.0.

Darwin-397B-ZTC, benchmark by benchmark

On GPQA Diamond, Darwin-397B-ZTC scores 93.4% and ranks #10 of 275. Only 9 models score higher, led by GPT-6 Astra (max) at 95.8%, which is 2.3 points ahead. It covers expert-level science questions. The board median is 71.7%, so Darwin-397B-ZTC is 21.7 points above it. Source: HuggingFace GPQA Diamond leaderboard, captured 2026-10-13.

Reading these numbers

The 1 score on this page comes from 1 source: HuggingFace GPQA Diamond leaderboard (1). No official leaderboard supplied any of them, so treat them as third-party measurements. With 1 results the aggregate rank can move a lot when one new score arrives.

Models ranked nearby

More from FINAL-Bench

Compare it on the live leaderboard → · How the aggregate score works