Gemini 2.0 Pro Exp (Feb 2025): benchmark scores, price and ranking
Gemini 2.0 Pro Exp (Feb 2025) from Google DeepMind ranks #488 of 743 LLMs on the LLMs Tiger aggregate benchmark score (46.7), based on 3 benchmark results captured up to 2026-10-13.
- Organisation
- Google DeepMind
- Type
- Preview release
- Open weights
- No
- Released
- 2025-02-05 (source: epoch)
- Aggregate rank
- #488 of 743 (score 46.7)
Relative to other models, Gemini 2.0 Pro Exp (Feb 2025) is strongest on GPQA Diamond (#157 of 275) and weakest on EnigmaEval (#21 of 24).
Across the 3 benchmarks where at least ten models are scored, Gemini 2.0 Pro Exp (Feb 2025) is in the top 10% on 0 and in the top half on 0.
Gemini 2.0 Pro Exp (Feb 2025) benchmark results
| Benchmark | Score | Rank | Source | Captured |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 65.7% | #157 of 275 | Epoch AI Benchmarking Hub | 2026-10-13 |
| Fiction.liveBench | 41.7% | #41 of 47 | Epoch AI Benchmarking Hub | 2026-10-13 |
| EnigmaEval | 0.7% | #21 of 24 | Epoch AI Benchmarking Hub | 2026-10-13 |
About Gemini 2.0 Pro Exp (Feb 2025)
Gemini 2.0 Pro Exp (Feb 2025) is a preview release from Google DeepMind. It was released on 2025-02-05, according to Epoch AI. No API price is listed for it yet. We hold 3 benchmark results for it across 2 areas, and none is in the top tenth of its board.
Where Gemini 2.0 Pro Exp (Feb 2025) stands
On our aggregate score, Gemini 2.0 Pro Exp (Feb 2025) is #488 of 743 ranked models, in the lower half. Its score is 46.7; the scale is centred on 50, so it sits 3.3 points below the typical model. That beats 34% of the ranked field. Among the 41 ranked Google DeepMind models it is #23. The next one up is Gemma 4 31B IT at 47.3. The next one down is gemini-2.0-flash-lite at 46.6.
Gemini 2.0 Pro Exp (Feb 2025), benchmark by benchmark
Gemini 2.0 Pro Exp (Feb 2025) lands below the middle on GPQA Diamond: 65.7%, #157 of 275, with 57% of the field scoring higher. GPT-6 Astra (max) leads at 95.8%; the closest result above is Qwen3-32B at 65.7%. It covers expert-level science questions. The board median is 71.7%, so Gemini 2.0 Pro Exp (Feb 2025) is 6.1 points below it. Source: Epoch AI Benchmarking Hub, captured 2026-10-13.
Fiction.liveBench is a weak spot. Gemini 2.0 Pro Exp (Feb 2025) scores 41.7%, #41 of 47, behind 85% of the models measured. The leader, grok-4-0709, reaches 94.4%. It covers long-context story comprehension (16k). The board median is 61.1%, so Gemini 2.0 Pro Exp (Feb 2025) is 19.4 points below it. Source: Epoch AI Benchmarking Hub, captured 2026-10-13.
EnigmaEval is a weak spot. Gemini 2.0 Pro Exp (Feb 2025) scores 0.7%, #21 of 24, behind 83% of the models measured. The leader, Gemini 3 Pro Preview, reaches 18.2%. It covers multi-step puzzle hunts. The board median is 2.9%, so Gemini 2.0 Pro Exp (Feb 2025) is 2.2 points below it. Source: Epoch AI Benchmarking Hub, captured 2026-10-13.
Strengths and weaknesses
Reasoning, maths and science: weak, ahead of 28% of the field on average across 2 benchmarks. Its best board here is GPQA Diamond (#157 of 275) and its weakest is EnigmaEval (#21 of 24).
Release history
The Google DeepMind model released before it was gemini-2.0-flash-lite on 2025-02-05, which scores 46.6. The next one was gemma-3-12b-it on 2025-03-12, at 39.1.
Reading these numbers
The 3 scores on this page come from 1 source: Epoch AI Benchmarking Hub (3). No official leaderboard supplied any of them, so treat them as third-party measurements. With 3 results the aggregate rank can move a lot when one new score arrives.
Models ranked nearby
- #485 o4-mini (high) (46.8)
- #486 codestral-2508 (46.8)
- #487 Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Instruct (46.8)
- #489 mistral-medium-2312 (46.7)
- #490 grok-4-1-fast-reasoning (46.7)
- #491 Llama 4 Maverick Instruct (46.7)
More from Google DeepMind
- Gemini 3.8 Flash (high) (#26, 54.0)
- Gemini 3.7 Flash (high) (#27, 53.9)
- Gemini 3 Pro Preview (#31, 53.7)
- Gemini 3 Deep Think (#60, 52.6)
- AI co-mathematician (#69, 52.3)
- Gemini 3 Flash (#120, 51.5)
Compare it on the live leaderboard → · How the aggregate score works