gemini-2.5-flash-preview-09-2025: benchmark scores, price and ranking
gemini-2.5-flash-preview-09-2025 from Google DeepMind ranks #222 of 743 LLMs on the LLMs Tiger aggregate benchmark score (50.0), based on 2 benchmark results captured up to 2026-10-13.
- Organisation
- Google DeepMind
- Type
- Preview release
- Open weights
- No
- Context window
- 1,048,576 tokens
- Cheapest API price
- $0.300 in / $2.50 out per million tokens (via vertex_ai, observed 2026-10-13T20:47Z)
- Aggregate rank
- #222 of 743 (score 50.0)
Across the 2 benchmarks where at least ten models are scored, gemini-2.5-flash-preview-09-2025 is in the top 10% on 1 and in the top half on 1.
Its cheapest listed input price, $0.300 per million tokens, is lower than that of 58% of the 427 models with a listed price.
gemini-2.5-flash-preview-09-2025 benchmark results
| Benchmark | Score | Rank | Source | Captured |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TheAgentCompany | 41.1% | #1 of 13 | Epoch AI Benchmarking Hub | 2026-10-13 |
| Terminal-Bench 2.0 | 17.1% | #26 of 28 | Epoch AI Benchmarking Hub | 2026-10-13 |
About gemini-2.5-flash-preview-09-2025
gemini-2.5-flash-preview-09-2025 is a preview release from Google DeepMind. It accepts up to 1,048,576 tokens of input at once. The cheapest API listing we track charges $0.300 per million input tokens and $2.50 per million output tokens, through vertex_ai. We hold 2 benchmark results for it across 2 areas, and 1 is in the top tenth of its board.
Where gemini-2.5-flash-preview-09-2025 stands
On our aggregate score, gemini-2.5-flash-preview-09-2025 is #222 of 743 ranked models, around the middle of the table. Its score is 50.0; the scale is centred on 50, so it sits 0.0 points below the typical model. That beats 70% of the ranked field. Among the 41 ranked Google DeepMind models it is #13. The next one up is gemini-2.5-pro_16K at 50.4. The next one down is gemini-2.5-flash-preview-09-2025_16k at 49.3.
gemini-2.5-flash-preview-09-2025, benchmark by benchmark
TheAgentCompany is where gemini-2.5-flash-preview-09-2025 does best: 41.1%, first of 13. The next result is claude-sonnet-4-20250514 at 33.1%, 8.0 points behind. It covers work tasks in a simulated software company. The board median is 8.6%, so gemini-2.5-flash-preview-09-2025 is 32.5 points above it. Source: Epoch AI Benchmarking Hub, captured 2026-10-13.
Terminal-Bench 2.0 is a weak spot. gemini-2.5-flash-preview-09-2025 scores 17.1%, #26 of 28, behind 89% of the models measured. The leader, Gemini 3 Pro Preview, reaches 69.4%. It covers real terminal tasks (agent + model). The board median is 37.3%, so gemini-2.5-flash-preview-09-2025 is 20.2 points below it. Source: Epoch AI Benchmarking Hub, captured 2026-10-13.
Strengths and weaknesses
gemini-2.5-flash-preview-09-2025 has too few results on boards with ten or more models to say where it is strong or weak. Treat any single score as a data point, not a verdict.
Price and value
The median input price across the 427 priced models is $0.500 per million tokens, so gemini-2.5-flash-preview-09-2025 costs less than the typical listing. Models that score within 1.5 points or better and cost less: Qwen2.5-Coder-7B-Instruct ($0.010, 49.5), DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (high) ($0.010, 48.9), DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (max) ($0.016, 53.1). Similar scores cost more on qwen-2.5-72b-instruct ($0.380) and Devstral (2512) ($0.400).
Reading these numbers
The 2 scores on this page come from 1 source: Epoch AI Benchmarking Hub (2). No official leaderboard supplied any of them, so treat them as third-party measurements. With 2 results the aggregate rank can move a lot when one new score arrives.
Models ranked nearby
- #219 step-5-preview-high (50.0)
- #220 claude-sonnet-4-20250514_2K (50.0)
- #221 gemini-exp-1114 (50.0)
- #223 DeepSeek v4 (unknown) (50.0)
- #224 Devstral Small (2512) (49.9)
- #225 claude-sonnet-4-20250514_32K (49.9)
More from Google DeepMind
- Gemini 3.8 Flash (high) (#26, 54.0)
- Gemini 3.7 Flash (high) (#27, 53.9)
- Gemini 3 Pro Preview (#31, 53.7)
- Gemini 3 Deep Think (#60, 52.6)
- AI co-mathematician (#69, 52.3)
- Gemini 3 Flash (#120, 51.5)
Compare it on the live leaderboard → · How the aggregate score works