Gemini 3.6 Flash (High): benchmark scores, price and ranking
Gemini 3.6 Flash (High) from Google ranks #318 of 743 LLMs on the LLMs Tiger aggregate benchmark score (48.9), based on 5 benchmark results captured up to 2026-10-13.
- Organisation
- Type
- Fast / low-cost (flash) model
- Open weights
- No
- Released
- 2026-07-21 (source: epoch)
- Cheapest API price
- $0.750 in / $3.75 out per million tokens (via gemini, observed 2026-10-13T20:47Z)
- Aggregate rank
- #318 of 743 (score 48.9)
Relative to other models, Gemini 3.6 Flash (High) is strongest on LMArena Document Elo (#5 of 18) and weakest on LMArena Code Elo (#24 of 30).
Across the 5 benchmarks where at least ten models are scored, Gemini 3.6 Flash (High) is in the top 10% on 0 and in the top half on 4.
Its cheapest listed input price, $0.750 per million tokens, is lower than that of 40% of the 427 models with a listed price.
Gemini 3.6 Flash (High) benchmark results
| Benchmark | Score | Rank | Source | Captured |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LMArena Document Elo | 1,456 | #5 of 18 | LMArena | 2026-10-13 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 60.4% | #30 of 87 | ARC Prize official leaderboard | 2026-10-13 |
| LMArena Text Elo | 1,483 | #11 of 28 | LMArena | 2026-10-06 |
| LMArena Vision Elo | 1,280 | #11 of 22 | LMArena | 2026-10-05 |
| LMArena Code Elo | 1,536 | #24 of 30 | LMArena | 2026-10-06 |
About Gemini 3.6 Flash (High)
Gemini 3.6 Flash (High) is a smaller, lower-cost model from Google. It was released on 2026-07-21, according to Epoch AI. The cheapest API listing we track charges $0.750 per million input tokens and $3.75 per million output tokens, through gemini. We hold 5 benchmark results for it across 3 areas, and none is in the top tenth of its board.
Where Gemini 3.6 Flash (High) stands
On our aggregate score, Gemini 3.6 Flash (High) is #318 of 743 ranked models, around the middle of the table. Its score is 48.9; the scale is centred on 50, so it sits 1.1 points below the typical model. That beats 57% of the ranked field. Among the 29 ranked Google models it is #16. The next one up is Gemini 2.0 Pro exp-02-05 at 49.4. The next one down is gemini-1.5-flash-exp-0827 at 48.7.
Gemini 3.6 Flash (High), benchmark by benchmark
LMArena Document Elo puts Gemini 3.6 Flash (High) at 1,456, #5 of 18. That beats 72% of the models tested, but 57 points short of Claude Fable 5.1 (max) (1,513). The results either side are gemini-3.5-flash-high (1,461) and Kimi K2.6 (1,451). It covers crowd-voted questions about documents. The board median is 1,440, so Gemini 3.6 Flash (High) is 16 points above it. Source: LMArena, captured 2026-10-13.
On ARC-AGI-2, Gemini 3.6 Flash (High) reaches 60.4%. It ranks #30 of 87, ahead of 66% of the field, and 34.6 points behind GPT-6 Astra (max) at 95.0%. The results either side are DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (max) (61.2%) and Kimi K3 (max) (60.4%). It covers abstract reasoning, ARC Prize public eval set. The board median is 22.8%, so Gemini 3.6 Flash (High) is 37.6 points above it. Source: ARC Prize official leaderboard, captured 2026-10-13.
Gemini 3.6 Flash (High) manages 1,483 on LMArena Text Elo, good for #11 of 28. gemini-4-argon-high leads at 1,525, 42 points further up, and 61% of models sit below. The results either side are Gemini 3 Pro (1,485) and GPT-6.1 Sol (max) (1,483). It covers head-to-head chat preference (crowd votes). The board median is 1,478, so Gemini 3.6 Flash (High) is 6 points above it. Source: LMArena, captured 2026-10-06.
LMArena Vision Elo puts Gemini 3.6 Flash (High) at 1,280, #11 of 22. That beats 50% of the models tested, but 16 points short of Gemini 3.7 Flash (high) (1,296). The results either side are GPT-6 Astra (max) (1,284) and gpt-5.2-chat-latest-20260210 (1,278). It covers crowd-voted image understanding. The board median is 1,279, so Gemini 3.6 Flash (High) is 1 points above it. Source: LMArena, captured 2026-10-05.
Gemini 3.6 Flash (High) lands below the middle on LMArena Code Elo: 1,536, #24 of 30, with 77% of the field scoring higher. Claude Opus 5.5 (max) leads at 1,814; the closest result above is step-5-preview-high at 1,570. It covers crowd-voted coding answers. The board median is 1,622, so Gemini 3.6 Flash (High) is 86 points below it. Source: LMArena, captured 2026-10-06.
Strengths and weaknesses
General knowledge and chat: solid, ahead of 61% of the field on average across 3 benchmarks. Its best board here is LMArena Document Elo (#5 of 18) and its weakest is LMArena Vision Elo (#11 of 22).
Price and value
The median input price across the 427 priced models is $0.500 per million tokens, so Gemini 3.6 Flash (High) costs more than the typical listing. Models that score within 1.5 points or better and cost less: Qwen2.5-Coder-7B-Instruct ($0.010, 49.5), DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (high) ($0.010, 48.9), DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (max) ($0.016, 53.1). Similar scores cost more on qwq-plus ($0.800) and Nova Pro ($0.800).
Release history
The Google model released before it was Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (High) on 2026-07-21, which scores 48.0. The next one was gemini-4-argon-high on 2026-09-30, at 59.5.
Reading these numbers
The 5 scores on this page come from 2 sources: LMArena (4), ARC Prize official leaderboard (1). 1 of them come from an official leaderboard and 4 from datasets or third-party runs. The leaderboard also lists 4 other reasoning-effort settings of this model, which redirect here. This page shows the highest. With 5 results the aggregate rank can move a lot when one new score arrives.
Gemini 3.6 Flash (High) is also listed at 4 other reasoning-effort settings; this page shows the highest-effort row, which is the one the leaderboard keeps by default.
Models ranked nearby
- #315 grok-4.3 (high) (48.9)
- #316 claude-opus-4-5-20251101-high-32k (48.9)
- #317 DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (high) (48.9)
- #319 Claude Opus 4 (48.9)
- #320 Gemini 2.0 Flash (Experimental) (48.8)
- #321 Phi-3-medium-4k-instruct (48.8)
More from Google
- gemini-4-argon-high (#10, 59.5)
- gemini-3.1-pro-preview-high (#16, 55.3)
- gemini-2.5-pro-preview-06-05 (#35, 53.5)
- Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 05-06 (#48, 53.0)
- Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 03-25 (#59, 52.6)
- Gemini 3 Deep Think (2/26) (#68, 52.4)
Compare it on the live leaderboard → · How the aggregate score works