grok-2-1212: benchmark scores, price and ranking

grok-2-1212 from xAI ranks #677 of 743 LLMs on the LLMs Tiger aggregate benchmark score (43.4), based on 5 benchmark results captured up to 2026-10-13.

Organisation
xAI
Type
Frontier model
Open weights
No
Released
2024-12-12 (source: epoch)
Aggregate rank
#677 of 743 (score 43.4)

Relative to other models, grok-2-1212 is strongest on DTBench (#82 of 146) and weakest on SimpleBench (#54 of 61).

Across the 5 benchmarks where at least ten models are scored, grok-2-1212 is in the top 10% on 0 and in the top half on 0.

grok-2-1212 benchmark results

grok-2-1212 benchmark scores, ranked against all models measured on each benchmark
BenchmarkScoreRankSourceCaptured
DTBench65.2%#82 of 146Epoch AI Benchmarking Hub2026-10-13
GPQA Diamond53.8%#180 of 275Epoch AI Benchmarking Hub2026-10-13
OTIS Mock AIME11.5%#137 of 189Epoch AI Benchmarking Hub2026-10-13
WeirdML22.2%#92 of 109Epoch AI Benchmarking Hub2026-10-13
SimpleBench22.7%#54 of 61Epoch AI Benchmarking Hub2026-10-13

About grok-2-1212

grok-2-1212 is a frontier model from xAI. It was released on 2024-12-12, according to Epoch AI. No API price is listed for it yet. We hold 5 benchmark results for it across 3 areas, and none is in the top tenth of its board.

Where grok-2-1212 stands

On our aggregate score, grok-2-1212 is #677 of 743 ranked models, in the lower half. Its score is 43.4; the scale is centred on 50, so it sits 6.6 points below the typical model. That beats 9% of the ranked field. Among the 26 ranked xAI models it is #26. The next one up is grok-code-fast-1 at 44.3.

grok-2-1212, benchmark by benchmark

grok-2-1212 lands below the middle on DTBench: 65.2%, #82 of 146, with 55% of the field scoring higher. Claude Opus 5.5 (max) leads at 98.9%; the closest result above is qwen3-30b-a3b-instruct-2507 at 67.2%. It covers dynamic tool-use benchmark. The board median is 68.8%, so grok-2-1212 is 3.6 points below it. Source: Epoch AI Benchmarking Hub, captured 2026-10-13.

grok-2-1212 lands below the middle on GPQA Diamond: 53.8%, #180 of 275, with 65% of the field scoring higher. GPT-6 Astra (max) leads at 95.8%; the closest result above is Claude 3.5 Sonnet (Jun 2024) at 54.0%. It covers expert-level science questions. The board median is 71.7%, so grok-2-1212 is 17.9 points below it. Source: Epoch AI Benchmarking Hub, captured 2026-10-13.

grok-2-1212 lands below the middle on OTIS Mock AIME: 11.5%, #137 of 189, with 72% of the field scoring higher. Claude Fable 5.1 (max) leads at 100.0%; the closest result above is phi-4 at 13.8%. It covers competition maths (AIME 2024-25 style). The board median is 57.8%, so grok-2-1212 is 46.2 points below it. Source: Epoch AI Benchmarking Hub, captured 2026-10-13.

WeirdML is a weak spot. grok-2-1212 scores 22.2%, #92 of 109, behind 83% of the models measured. The leader, GPT-6 Astra (max), reaches 93.3%. It covers unusual machine-learning tasks. The board median is 41.2%, so grok-2-1212 is 18.9 points below it. Source: Epoch AI Benchmarking Hub, captured 2026-10-13.

SimpleBench is a weak spot. grok-2-1212 scores 22.7%, #54 of 61, behind 87% of the models measured. The leader, Claude Fable 5 (max), reaches 81.9%. It covers trick questions that test common sense. The board median is 41.4%, so grok-2-1212 is 18.7 points below it. Source: Epoch AI Benchmarking Hub, captured 2026-10-13.

Strengths and weaknesses

Reasoning, maths and science: weak, ahead of 25% of the field on average across 3 benchmarks. Its best board here is GPQA Diamond (#180 of 275) and its weakest is SimpleBench (#54 of 61).

Release history

The xAI model released before it was Grok-2 on 2024-12-12, which scores 49.6. The next one was grok-3 on 2025-02-19, at 46.5.

Reading these numbers

The 5 scores on this page come from 1 source: Epoch AI Benchmarking Hub (5). No official leaderboard supplied any of them, so treat them as third-party measurements. With 5 results the aggregate rank can move a lot when one new score arrives.

Models ranked nearby

More from xAI

Compare it on the live leaderboard → · How the aggregate score works