Phi-3-medium-128k-instruct: benchmark scores, price and ranking
Phi-3-medium-128k-instruct from Microsoft ranks #653 of 743 LLMs on the LLMs Tiger aggregate benchmark score (44.0), based on 2 benchmark results captured up to 2026-10-13.
- Organisation
- Microsoft
- Type
- Open-weight / local model
- Open weights
- Yes
- Released
- 2024-04-23 (source: epoch)
- Cheapest API price
- $0.170 in / $0.680 out per million tokens (via azure_ai, observed 2026-10-13T20:47Z)
- Aggregate rank
- #653 of 743 (score 44.0)
Across the 2 benchmarks where at least ten models are scored, Phi-3-medium-128k-instruct is in the top 10% on 0 and in the top half on 0.
Its cheapest listed input price, $0.170 per million tokens, is lower than that of 71% of the 427 models with a listed price.
Phi-3-medium-128k-instruct benchmark results
| Benchmark | Score | Rank | Source | Captured |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MMLU-Pro | 51.9% | #75 of 136 | HuggingFace MMLU-Pro leaderboard | 2026-10-13 |
| GPQA Diamond | 27.6% | #256 of 275 | Epoch AI Benchmarking Hub | 2026-10-13 |
About Phi-3-medium-128k-instruct
Phi-3-medium-128k-instruct is an open-weight model that can run on your own hardware from Microsoft. It was released on 2024-04-23, according to Epoch AI. The cheapest API listing we track charges $0.170 per million input tokens and $0.680 per million output tokens, through azure_ai. We hold 2 benchmark results for it across 1 area, and none is in the top tenth of its board.
Where Phi-3-medium-128k-instruct stands
On our aggregate score, Phi-3-medium-128k-instruct is #653 of 743 ranked models, in the lower half. Its score is 44.0; the scale is centred on 50, so it sits 6.0 points below the typical model. That beats 12% of the ranked field. Among the 3 ranked Microsoft models it is #3. The next one up is WizardLM-2-8x22B at 45.3.
Phi-3-medium-128k-instruct, benchmark by benchmark
Phi-3-medium-128k-instruct lands below the middle on MMLU-Pro: 51.9%, #75 of 136, with 54% of the field scoring higher. Darwin-180B-RSI leads at 88.1%; the closest result above is Yi-1.5-34B-Chat at 52.3%. It covers 57-subject knowledge + reasoning. The board median is 55.3%, so Phi-3-medium-128k-instruct is 3.3 points below it. Source: HuggingFace MMLU-Pro leaderboard, captured 2026-10-13.
GPQA Diamond is a weak spot. Phi-3-medium-128k-instruct scores 27.6%, #256 of 275, behind 93% of the models measured. The leader, GPT-6 Astra (max), reaches 95.8%. It covers expert-level science questions. The board median is 71.7%, so Phi-3-medium-128k-instruct is 44.1 points below it. Source: Epoch AI Benchmarking Hub, captured 2026-10-13.
Strengths and weaknesses
Reasoning, maths and science: weak, ahead of 26% of the field on average across 2 benchmarks. Its best board here is MMLU-Pro (#75 of 136) and its weakest is GPQA Diamond (#256 of 275).
Price and value
The median input price across the 427 priced models is $0.500 per million tokens, so Phi-3-medium-128k-instruct costs less than the typical listing. Models that score within 1.5 points or better and cost less: Qwen2.5-Coder-7B-Instruct ($0.010, 49.5), DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (high) ($0.010, 48.9), Qwen2.5-Coder-3B-Instruct ($0.010, 46.5). Similar scores cost more on DeepSeek-V3 ($0.200) and grok-code-fast-1 ($0.200).
Release history
The Microsoft model released before it was WizardLM-2-8x22B on 2024-04-15, which scores 45.3. The next one was Phi-3-mini-4k-instruct on 2024-04-23, at 46.2.
Reading these numbers
The 2 scores on this page come from 2 sources: Epoch AI Benchmarking Hub (1), HuggingFace MMLU-Pro leaderboard (1). No official leaderboard supplied any of them, so treat them as third-party measurements. With 2 results the aggregate rank can move a lot when one new score arrives.
Models ranked nearby
- #650 gemini-1.5-pro-001 (44.0)
- #651 Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Base (44.0)
- #652 Mellum2-12B-A2.5B-Base-Pretrain (44.0)
- #654 Yi 6B (44.0)
- #655 Mistral Small 3.2 (44.0)
- #656 Hermes-2-Theta-Llama-3-70B (44.0)
More from Microsoft
- Phi-3-mini-4k-instruct (#536, 46.2)
- WizardLM-2-8x22B (#597, 45.3)
Compare it on the live leaderboard → · How the aggregate score works