Qwen 3.6 Flash: benchmark scores, price and ranking

Qwen 3.6 Flash from Alibaba is a recent or sparsely tested model with 1 benchmark result on record; it has not been measured on enough benchmarks shared with other models to receive an aggregate rank. This page lists every score we have, based on 1 benchmark results captured up to 2026-10-13.

Organisation: Alibaba
Type: Fast / low-cost (flash) model
Open weights: No
Released: 2026-04-27 (source: epoch)
Aggregate rank: Not ranked yet (too few shared benchmarks)

Across the 1 benchmark where at least ten models are scored, Qwen 3.6 Flash is in the top 10% on 0 and in the top half on 1.

Qwen 3.6 Flash benchmark results

Qwen 3.6 Flash benchmark scores, ranked against all models measured on each benchmark
Benchmark	Score	Rank	Source	Captured
Epoch ECI	143	#36 of 204	Epoch AI Benchmarking Hub	2026-10-13

About Qwen 3.6 Flash

Qwen 3.6 Flash is a smaller, lower-cost model from Alibaba. It was released on 2026-04-27, according to Epoch AI. No API price is listed for it yet. We hold 1 benchmark result for it across 1 area, and none is in the top tenth of its board.

Where Qwen 3.6 Flash stands

Qwen 3.6 Flash has 1 result so far and shares too few benchmarks with other models to get an aggregate rank. The rank will appear on its own once more scores are published.

Qwen 3.6 Flash, benchmark by benchmark

Epoch ECI puts Qwen 3.6 Flash at 143, #36 of 204. That beats 82% of the models tested, but 13 points short of Qwen 3.8 Max (156). The results either side are GLM-4.7 (144) and Gemini 2.5 Flash (Sep 2025) (143). It covers Epoch Capabilities Index: Epoch's own aggregate of ~40 benchmarks. The board median is 127, so Qwen 3.6 Flash is 16 points above it. Source: Epoch AI Benchmarking Hub, captured 2026-10-13.

Release history

The Alibaba model released before it was Qwen3.6 27B on 2026-04-22, which scores 44.9. The next one was qwen3.7-max-20260517 on 2026-05-17, at 47.2.

Reading these numbers

The 1 score on this page comes from 1 source: Epoch AI Benchmarking Hub (1). No official leaderboard supplied any of them, so treat them as third-party measurements. With 1 results the aggregate rank can move a lot when one new score arrives.