qwen-max-2025-01-25: benchmark scores, price and ranking

qwen-max-2025-01-25 from Alibaba ranks #520 of 743 LLMs on the LLMs Tiger aggregate benchmark score (46.4), based on 4 benchmark results captured up to 2026-10-13.

Organisation
Alibaba
Type
Frontier model
Open weights
No
Released
2025-01-25 (source: name)
Aggregate rank
#520 of 743 (score 46.4)

Relative to other models, qwen-max-2025-01-25 is strongest on Fiction.liveBench (#18 of 47) and weakest on Aider Polyglot (#36 of 49).

Across the 4 benchmarks where at least ten models are scored, qwen-max-2025-01-25 is in the top 10% on 0 and in the top half on 1.

qwen-max-2025-01-25 benchmark results

qwen-max-2025-01-25 benchmark scores, ranked against all models measured on each benchmark
BenchmarkScoreRankSourceCaptured
Fiction.liveBench66.7%#18 of 47Epoch AI Benchmarking Hub2026-10-13
GPQA Diamond56.1%#173 of 275Epoch AI Benchmarking Hub2026-10-13
OTIS Mock AIME16.1%#134 of 189Epoch AI Benchmarking Hub2026-10-13
Aider Polyglot21.8%#36 of 49Aider polyglot leaderboard2026-10-13

About qwen-max-2025-01-25

qwen-max-2025-01-25 is a frontier model from Alibaba. It was released on 2025-01-25, according to the model's own name. No API price is listed for it yet. We hold 4 benchmark results for it across 3 areas, and none is in the top tenth of its board.

Where qwen-max-2025-01-25 stands

On our aggregate score, qwen-max-2025-01-25 is #520 of 743 ranked models, in the lower half. Its score is 46.4; the scale is centred on 50, so it sits 3.6 points below the typical model. That beats 30% of the ranked field. Among the 74 ranked Alibaba models it is #55. The next one up is Qwen3.5 Flash at 46.4. The next one down is qwen1.5-110b-chat at 46.3.

qwen-max-2025-01-25, benchmark by benchmark

Fiction.liveBench puts qwen-max-2025-01-25 at 66.7%, #18 of 47. That beats 62% of the models tested, but 27.7 points short of grok-4-0709 (94.4%). The results either side are Kimi-K2-Instruct-0905 (66.7%) and Qwen3-Max-Instruct (66.7%). It covers long-context story comprehension (16k). The board median is 61.1%, so qwen-max-2025-01-25 is 5.6 points above it. Source: Epoch AI Benchmarking Hub, captured 2026-10-13.

qwen-max-2025-01-25 lands below the middle on GPQA Diamond: 56.1%, #173 of 275, with 63% of the field scoring higher. GPT-6 Astra (max) leads at 95.8%; the closest result above is qwen3-8b at 56.8%. It covers expert-level science questions. The board median is 71.7%, so qwen-max-2025-01-25 is 15.6 points below it. Source: Epoch AI Benchmarking Hub, captured 2026-10-13.

qwen-max-2025-01-25 lands below the middle on OTIS Mock AIME: 16.1%, #134 of 189, with 70% of the field scoring higher. Claude Fable 5.1 (max) leads at 100.0%; the closest result above is gemini-1.5-flash-002 at 16.2%. It covers competition maths (AIME 2024-25 style). The board median is 57.8%, so qwen-max-2025-01-25 is 41.7 points below it. Source: Epoch AI Benchmarking Hub, captured 2026-10-13.

qwen-max-2025-01-25 lands below the middle on Aider Polyglot: 21.8%, #36 of 49, with 71% of the field scoring higher. gemini-2.5-pro-preview-06-05 leads at 83.1%; the closest result above is gemini-2.0-flash-exp at 22.2%. It covers edits across 6 languages (225 exercises). The board median is 44.9%, so qwen-max-2025-01-25 is 23.1 points below it. Source: Aider polyglot leaderboard, captured 2026-10-13.

Strengths and weaknesses

Reasoning, maths and science: uneven, ahead of 33% of the field on average across 2 benchmarks. Its best board here is GPQA Diamond (#173 of 275) and its weakest is OTIS Mock AIME (#134 of 189).

Release history

The Alibaba model released before it was ollama/qwen2.5-coder:32b on 2024-11-12, which scores 51.9. The next one was qwen-plus-2025-01-25 on 2025-01-25, at 45.7.

Reading these numbers

The 4 scores on this page come from 2 sources: Epoch AI Benchmarking Hub (3), Aider polyglot leaderboard (1). 1 of them come from an official leaderboard and 3 from datasets or third-party runs. With 4 results the aggregate rank can move a lot when one new score arrives.

Models ranked nearby

More from Alibaba

Compare it on the live leaderboard → · How the aggregate score works