Qwen2.5-Coder (7B): benchmark scores, price and ranking

Qwen2.5-Coder (7B) from Alibaba is a recent or sparsely tested model with 1 benchmark result on record; it has not been measured on enough benchmarks shared with other models to receive an aggregate rank. This page lists every score we have, based on 1 benchmark results captured up to 2026-10-14.

Organisation: Alibaba
Type: Frontier model
Open weights: No
Released: 2024-09-18 (source: epoch)
Aggregate rank: Not ranked yet (too few shared benchmarks)

Across the 1 benchmark where at least ten models are scored, Qwen2.5-Coder (7B) is in the top 10% on 0 and in the top half on 0.

Qwen2.5-Coder (7B) benchmark results

Qwen2.5-Coder (7B) benchmark scores, ranked against all models measured on each benchmark
Benchmark	Score	Rank	Source	Captured
Epoch ECI	113	#150 of 204	Epoch AI Benchmarking Hub	2026-10-14

About Qwen2.5-Coder (7B)

Qwen2.5-Coder (7B) is a frontier model from Alibaba. It was released on 2024-09-18, according to Epoch AI. No API price is listed for it yet. We hold 1 benchmark result for it across 1 area, and none is in the top tenth of its board.

Where Qwen2.5-Coder (7B) stands

Qwen2.5-Coder (7B) has 1 result so far and shares too few benchmarks with other models to get an aggregate rank. The rank will appear on its own once more scores are published.

Qwen2.5-Coder (7B), benchmark by benchmark

Qwen2.5-Coder (7B) lands below the middle on Epoch ECI: 113, #150 of 204, with 73% of the field scoring higher. Qwen 3.8 Max leads at 156; the closest result above is GPT-3.5 Turbo (Jun 2023) at 113. It covers Epoch Capabilities Index: Epoch's own aggregate of ~40 benchmarks. The board median is 127, so Qwen2.5-Coder (7B) is 14 points below it. Source: Epoch AI Benchmarking Hub, captured 2026-10-14.

Release history

The Alibaba model released before it was ollama/qwen2.5-coder:14b on 2024-09-18, which scores 50.1. The next one was Qwen2.5-72B on 2024-09-19, at 50.1.

Reading these numbers

The 1 score on this page comes from 1 source: Epoch AI Benchmarking Hub (1). No official leaderboard supplied any of them, so treat them as third-party measurements. With 1 results the aggregate rank can move a lot when one new score arrives.