SWE-Llama 7B: benchmark scores, price and ranking
SWE-Llama 7B from Meta ranks #683 of 743 LLMs on the LLMs Tiger aggregate benchmark score (43.2), based on 3 benchmark results captured up to 2026-10-13.
- Organisation
- Meta
- Type
- Open-weight / local model
- Open weights
- Yes
- Aggregate rank
- #683 of 743 (score 43.2)
Relative to other models, SWE-Llama 7B is strongest on SWE-bench Lite (#18 of 20) and weakest on SWE-bench Verified (#71 of 73).
Across the 3 benchmarks where at least ten models are scored, SWE-Llama 7B is in the top 10% on 0 and in the top half on 0.
SWE-Llama 7B benchmark results
| Benchmark | Score | Rank | Source | Captured |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SWE-bench Lite | 1.3% | #18 of 20 | SWE-bench Lite leaderboard | 2026-10-13 |
| SWE-bench Test | 0.7% | #10 of 11 | SWE-bench Test leaderboard | 2026-10-13 |
| SWE-bench Verified | 1.4% | #71 of 73 | SWE-bench Verified leaderboard | 2026-10-13 |
About SWE-Llama 7B
SWE-Llama 7B is an open-weight model that can run on your own hardware from Meta. No API price is listed for it yet. We hold 3 benchmark results for it across 2 areas, and none is in the top tenth of its board.
Where SWE-Llama 7B stands
On our aggregate score, SWE-Llama 7B is #683 of 743 ranked models, in the lower half. Its score is 43.2; the scale is centred on 50, so it sits 6.8 points below the typical model. That beats 8% of the ranked field. Among the 6 ranked Meta models it is #6. The next one up is ollama/llama3.2:3b-instruct-fp16 at 44.5.
SWE-Llama 7B, benchmark by benchmark
SWE-bench Lite is a weak spot. SWE-Llama 7B scores 1.3%, #18 of 20, behind 85% of the models measured. The leader, Claude 4 Sonnet, reaches 56.7%. It covers real GitHub issues resolved. The board median is 24.7%, so SWE-Llama 7B is 23.3 points below it. Source: SWE-bench Lite leaderboard, captured 2026-10-13.
SWE-bench Test is a weak spot. SWE-Llama 7B scores 0.7%, #10 of 11, behind 82% of the models measured. The leader, Claude 4.5 Opus, reaches 52.6%. It covers real GitHub issues resolved. The board median is 12.5%, so SWE-Llama 7B is 11.8 points below it. Source: SWE-bench Test leaderboard, captured 2026-10-13.
SWE-bench Verified is a weak spot. SWE-Llama 7B scores 1.4%, #71 of 73, behind 96% of the models measured. The leader, Claude Opus 4.7 (max), reaches 83.5%. It covers real GitHub issues resolved. The board median is 56.4%, so SWE-Llama 7B is 55.0 points below it. Source: SWE-bench Verified leaderboard, captured 2026-10-13.
Strengths and weaknesses
Software engineering: weak, ahead of 6% of the field on average across 2 benchmarks. Its best board here is SWE-bench Lite (#18 of 20) and its weakest is SWE-bench Verified (#71 of 73).
Reading these numbers
The 3 scores on this page come from 3 sources: SWE-bench Lite leaderboard (1), SWE-bench Test leaderboard (1), SWE-bench Verified leaderboard (1). 3 of them come from an official leaderboard and 0 from datasets or third-party runs. With 3 results the aggregate rank can move a lot when one new score arrives.
Models ranked nearby
- #680 mistral-large-2407 (43.3)
- #681 granite-3.0-2b-base (43.3)
- #682 open-mixtral-8x7b (43.2)
- #684 Trinity Large Thinking (43.2)
- #685 granite-4.0-micro (43.2)
- #686 SWE-Llama 13B (43.2)
More from Meta
- Llama3-SWE-RL-70B (#337, 48.6)
- llama3-70b-8192 (#381, 48.1)
- Llama 4 Maverick Instruct (#491, 46.7)
- Llama 4 Scout Instruct (#565, 45.6)
- ollama/llama3.2:3b-instruct-fp16 (#631, 44.5)
Compare it on the live leaderboard → · How the aggregate score works