swe-search: benchmark scores, price and ranking

swe-search from Anthropic ranks #188 of 743 LLMs on the LLMs Tiger aggregate benchmark score (50.5), based on 1 benchmark results captured up to 2026-10-13.

Organisation
Anthropic
Type
Frontier model
Open weights
No
Aggregate rank
#188 of 743 (score 50.5)

Across the 1 benchmark where at least ten models are scored, swe-search is in the top 10% on 0 and in the top half on 1.

swe-search benchmark results

swe-search benchmark scores, ranked against all models measured on each benchmark
BenchmarkScoreRankSourceCaptured
SWE-bench Verified62.2%#30 of 73SWE-bench Verified leaderboard2026-10-13

About swe-search

swe-search is a frontier model from Anthropic. No API price is listed for it yet. We hold 1 benchmark result for it across 1 area, and none is in the top tenth of its board.

Where swe-search stands

On our aggregate score, swe-search is #188 of 743 ranked models, around the middle of the table. Its score is 50.5; the scale is centred on 50, so it sits 0.5 points above the typical model. That beats 75% of the ranked field. Among the 70 ranked Anthropic models it is #31. The next one up is Claude 3.7 Sonnet w/ Review Heavy at 50.5. The next one down is Claude 3.7 Sonnet (64k thinking) at 50.4.

swe-search, benchmark by benchmark

SWE-bench Verified puts swe-search at 62.2%, #30 of 73. That beats 59% of the models tested, but 21.3 points short of Claude Opus 4.7 (max) (83.5%). The results either side are Claude 3.7 Sonnet w/ Review Heavy (62.4%) and MiniMax-M2 (61.0%). It covers real GitHub issues resolved. The board median is 56.4%, so swe-search is 5.8 points above it. Source: SWE-bench Verified leaderboard, captured 2026-10-13.

Reading these numbers

The 1 score on this page comes from 1 source: SWE-bench Verified leaderboard (1). No official leaderboard supplied any of them, so treat them as third-party measurements. With 1 results the aggregate rank can move a lot when one new score arrives.

Models ranked nearby

More from Anthropic

Compare it on the live leaderboard → · How the aggregate score works